A Prospective Study on the Application of Endometrial Cytology Examination in the Screening of Endometrial Cancer

Authors

  • Zheng Fang Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Zhaoqing No. 2 People’s Hospital, Zhaoqing City, Guangdong Province, 526060, China
  • Du Lianfang Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Zhaoqing No. 2 People’s Hospital, Zhaoqing City, Guangdong Province, 526060, China
  • Xie Cuiqi Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Zhaoqing No. 2 People’s Hospital, Zhaoqing City, Guangdong Province, 526060, China
  • Shao Shaowei Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Zhaoqing No. 2 People’s Hospital, Zhaoqing City, Guangdong Province, 526060, China
  • Luo Qiaoming Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Zhaoqing No. 2 People’s Hospital, Zhaoqing City, Guangdong Province, 526060, China
  • Li Qiyan Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Zhaoqing No. 2 People’s Hospital, Zhaoqing City, Guangdong Province, 526060, China
  • Ma Ling Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Zhuhai Maternal and Child Health Care, Zhuhai City, Guangdong Province, 519000, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-2279.2015.04.02.6

Keywords:

 Endometrial cytology, endometrial sampling device for cytology, endometrial cancer, thinprep cytology test.

Abstract

 Background: Endometrial cancer is one of the most common gynecology malignancies. But there is still lack of an accurate, reliable, convenient, easy, economical and practical method for early detection of endometrial cancer and precancerous lesions. The aim of this study is to evaluate the specimen quality and diagnostic accuracy of endometrial cytology examination in the screening of endometrial cancer.

Methods: 95 patients with abnormal uterine bleeding or vaginal ultrasound examination results indicating intrauterine abnormalities and needing endometrial examination were investigated, and specimens were collected using endometrial sampling device for cytology (ESDC) and sliced using thinprep cytology test (TCT), meanwhile, hysteroscopy auxiliary diagnostic curettage and histopathological examination were performed.

Results: The satisfaction rate was 100% for the specimens collected using ESDC and 97.9% for those using diagnostic curettage. The difference in the satisfaction rate of collecting specimens was statistically significant between the two methods, and the satisfaction rate of collecting specimen using endometrial cytology was superior to that using diagnostic curettage. Taking diagnostic curettage histopathologic results as "gold standard", the sensitivity of endometrial cytology was 63.6%, specificity 93.6%, positive predictive value 70% and negative predictive value 95.2% in the screening of endometrial cancer.

Conclusion: Endometrial cytology can be used as a reliable, safe and simple method in the screening of endometrial cancer.

References

DeSantis CE, Lin CC, Mariotto AB, Siegel RL, Stein KD, Kramer JL, et al. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2014. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 2014; 64: 252-71. http://dx.doi.org/10.3322/caac.21235

Nakagawa-Okamura C, Sato S, Tsuji I, Kuramoto H, Tsubono Y, Aoki D, et al. Effectiveness of mass screening for endometrial cancer. Acta cytologica 2002; 46: 277-83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000326722

Papaefthimiou M, Symiakaki H, Mentzelopoulou P, Tsiveleka A, Kyroudes A, Voulgaris Z, et al. Study on the morphology and reproducibility of the diagnosis of endometrial lesions utilizing liquid-based cytology. Cancer 2005; 105: 56-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cncr.21025

Norimatsu Y, Kouda H, Kobayashi TK, Moriya T, Yanoh K, Tsukayama C, et al. Utility of thin-layer preparations in the endometrial cytology: evaluation of benign endometrial lesions. Annals of Diagnostic Pathology 2008; 12: 103-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2007.05.005

Fan B, Zhao Q, Zhang S, Wang T, Deng X. Assessment of transvaginal sonography combined with endometrial cytology as a mass screening method for endometrial cancer in Beijing. The Journal of International Medical Research 2010; 38: 803-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/147323001003800307

Towbin NA, Gviazda IM, March CM. Office hysteroscopy versus transvaginal ultrasonography in the evaluation of patients with excessive uterine bleeding. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1996; 174: 1678-82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9378(96)70196-5

Yang X, Liao QP, Wu C, Zhang NY, Zhao J, Chen R, et al. [Screening and sampling of endometrial carcinoma accuracy of the endometrial cytology test for the screening of endometrial cancer]. Zhonghua fu chan ke za zhi 2013; 48: 884-90.

Remondi C, Sesti F, Bonanno E, Pietropolli A, Piccione E. Diagnostic accuracy of liquid-based endometrial cytology in the evaluation of endometrial pathology in postmenopausal women. Cytopathology: Official Journal of the British Society for Clinical Cytology 2013; 24: 365-71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cyt.12013

Kipp BR, Medeiros F, Campion MB, Distad TJ, Peterson LM, Keeney GL, et al. Direct uterine sampling with the Tao brush sampler using a liquid-based preparation method for the detection of endometrial cancer and atypical hyperplasia: a feasibility study. Cancer 2008; 114: 228-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cncr.23636

Buccoliero AM, Gheri CF, Castiglione F, Garbini F, Barbetti A, Fambrini M, et al. Liquid-based endometrial cytology: cyto-histological correlation in a population of 917 women. Cytopathology: official journal of the British Society for Clinical Cytology 2007; 18: 241-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2303.2007.00463.x

Fujiwara H, Takahashi Y, Takano M, Miyamoto M, Nakamura K, Kaneta Y, et al. Evaluation of endometrial cytology: cytohistological correlations in 1,441 cancer patients. Oncology 2015; 88: 86-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000368162

Downloads

Published

2015-04-29

How to Cite

Zheng Fang, Du Lianfang, Xie Cuiqi, Shao Shaowei, Luo Qiaoming, Li Qiyan, & Ma Ling. (2015). A Prospective Study on the Application of Endometrial Cytology Examination in the Screening of Endometrial Cancer. Journal of Cancer Research Updates, 4(2),  85–89. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-2279.2015.04.02.6