Clinical Significance of Low-Level Radiation Exposure in Mammalian Radiobiology Investigated by Radon (Rn<sup>222</sup>) Dissolved Water Intake in a Dog
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30683/1929-2279.2018.07.04.4Keywords:
Alternative treatment, radiation hormesis, linear non-threshold theory, uranium-238, gamma-spectrometer.Abstract
To establish the clinical significance of low-level radiation exposure, this study was conducted under the artificial radioactive circumstances, such as internal exposure of alpha-ray with radon (Rn222) dissolved water (RDW) intake, and its production method is uncomplicated and presented as public property by the third party. Here, we report that this method provides the wide range of availabilities in radioactivity. This 1-year experimental study investigated the effect of RDW on a dog as a mammal model, resulted in no biochemical harmfulness. To acquire the accuracy of this consequence, the accumulation of more data in mammal models is indespensable with consistent radioactive backgrounds.
References
Takatori M, Hattori S, Yagi M. Clinical significance of low dose radiation hormesis. Int J Low Radiation 2010; 7: 511-19. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJLR.2010.037672 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJLR.2010.037672
Takatori M, Yagi M, Hattori S. Potential solutions in radiation hormesis. J Cancer Res Updates 2013; 2: 95-98. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-2279.2013.02.02.2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-2279.2013.02.02.2
Pearce MS, Salotti JA, Little MP, et al. Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukemia and brain tumors: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 2012; 380: 499-505. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60815-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60815-0
Little MP, Wakeford R, Tawn EJ, et al. Risk associated with low doses and low dose rates of ionizing radiation: why linearity may be (almost) the best we can do. Radiology 2009; 251: 6-12. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2511081686 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2511081686
Doss M. Shifting the paradigm in radiation safety. Dose Response 2012; 10: 562-83. https://doi.org/10.2203/dose-response.11-056.Doss DOI: https://doi.org/10.2203/dose-response.11-056.Doss
Hendee WR, O’Connor MK. Radiation risks of medical imaging: separating fact from fantasy. Radiology 2012; 264(2): 312-21. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.12112678 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.12112678