Poor Science; Poorly Trained Scientists; Poor Policies: Major Deterrents to the War on Cancer

Authors

  • Leslie C. Costello School of Dentistry Department of Oncology and Diagnostic Sciences and the Greenebaum Cancer Center, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland 21201, USA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-2279.2018.07.03.3

Keywords:

Cancer, NIH policies, training of scientists, excessive molecular biology, holistic physiological/pathophysiological approach.

Abstract

Although the availability of funding has been described as the major limitation on advances in cancer, the progress in the war on cancer has been deterred mainly by poor science, poorly trained scientists, and poor NIH policies. This is the result of NIH policies of its extreme focus on molecular biology (genomics, molecular genetics, molecular biology) identification of the molecular factors and pathways; which are required for the acceptability of treatment and preventive protocols. As such, this has influenced virtually all agencies that provide grants for medical research to adopt the NIH policies. This has impacted the funding of the research as well as the focus of the training of scientists. Directors of NCI Dr. Varmus (also Nobel Prize awardee) and Dr. Zerhouni had addressed this issue; and they rejected the necessity of molecular biology studies and information. NIH should return to the holistic physiological/pathophysiological approach to studies of cancer issues. This would provide the best approach for winning the war on cancer.

References

Zerhouni E. The NIH roadmap. Science 2003; 332: 63-5. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1091867

Leaf C. Why we're losing the war on cancer (and how to win it). Fortune 2004; 149(6): 76-82.

Costello LC. The effect of contemporary education and training of biomedical scientists on present and future medical research. Acad Med 2009; 84: 459-63. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e31819a7c6b

Perspective: Is NIH funding the "best science by the best scientists"? A critique of the NIH R01 research grant review policies. Acad Med 2010; 85(5): 775-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181d74256

National Institutes of Health. Enhancing Peer Review at NIH: Overview. Available at: http://enhancing-peer-review.nih.gov/index.html. Accessed January 18, 2010

Office of Extramural Research, National Institutes of Health. Encouraging Early Transition to Research Independence: Modifying the NIH New Investigator Policy to Identify Early Stage Investigators. Available at: http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-08-121.html. Accessed January 18, 2010.

Bernard C. An Introduction to the Study of Experimental Medicine. New York, NY: The Macmillan Company 1927.

Downloads

Published

2018-08-15

How to Cite

Leslie C. Costello. (2018). Poor Science; Poorly Trained Scientists; Poor Policies: Major Deterrents to the War on Cancer . Journal of Cancer Research Updates, 7(3), 79–83. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-2279.2018.07.03.3

Issue

Section

Articles